Profile
Profile
Chun Ho has a broad civil practice encompassing company and insolvency works, securities and regulatory matters, and a wide spectrum of other civil and commercial disputes, with particular experience in shareholders’ dispute, breach of fiduciary duties claims, civil fraud, asset recovery claims and defamation.
He has been appointed as a part-time lecturer of law (non-clinical) at the University of Hong Kong.
He was awarded the Bar Scholarship in 2016.
Chun Ho is fluent in English, Mandarin and Cantonese.
Company, Insolvency and Bankruptcy
- Yuen Tsz Chun Frank and Chan Hoi Yan, The Joint and Several Liquidators of Rz3262019 Ltd (in Liquidation) v. Zhou Ying Investments Group Ltd and Others (19/09/2025, HCMP1589/2024) [2025] HKCFI 4350
- Re China South City Holdings Ltd [2025] HKCFI 3719
- Chen Peixiong v. Convoy Global Holdings Ltd [2024] HKCLC 587
- Yang Yu v. HK Huanhai Trade Co Ltd [2024] HKCLC 615
- Re NT Pharma International Co Ltd [2023] HKCLC 498; [2023] 5 HKC 532
- Re Jiayuan Inernational Group Ltd [2023] HKCLC 239
- Rich Region Holdings Ltd v. Gold Brilliant Investment Ltd [2023] 2 HKLRD 636
- Lohas Holding Ltd v. The Registrar of Companies [2022] 5 HKLRD 653; [2023] 1 HKC 296; [2022] HKCLC 1281
- Re Silver Strarlight Ltd[2022] HKCFI 2076
- Re Proman International Ltd[2022] HKCFI 1450
- Shih Hua Investment Co., Ltd v Zhang Aidong[2022] 1 HKLRD 1376
- Re Chong Hing Bank Ltd[2022] 1 HKC 377
- Re H12 (HK) Ltd[2021] HKCFI 1836
- Re Grand Peace Group Holdings Ltd[2021] 4 HKLRD 230
- Re Grand Peace Group Holdings Ltd[2021] HKCLC 901
- Re Grand Peace Group Holdings Ltd[2021] 4 HKC 364; [2021] HKCLC 607
- Kwok Hiu Kwan v Johnny Chen and Others[2021] 4 HKC 167
- Kwok Hiu Kwan v Johnny Chen and Others[2020] 3 HKC 408
- Re Minloy Ltd and Others[2020] HKCFI 2215
- Convoy Global Holdings Ltd and Another v Kwok Hiu Kwan and Another[2020] 4 HKLRD 222
- Cypress House Capital Ltd v Hua Han Health Industry Holdings[2019] HKCFI 1826
- Yung Siu Wa v Raffles Family Office Ltd[2018] 5 HKLRD 816
- Kwok Hiu Kwan v Johnny Chen and Others[2018] 6 HKC 394
- Kwok Hiu Kwan v Convoy Global Holdings Ltd and Others[2018] HKCFI 1729
Bankruptcy
- Robert Scott Woods, the Trustee-in-Bankruptcy of Phillip James Kingston v. Industrial Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Ltd [2024] 5 HKLRD 788; [2025] 2 HKC 259
- Chen Yung Ngai Kenneth v. Johnnie Yam, Jacky Lee & Co (A Firm)[2024] 3 HKC 294
- Re Pan Sutong [2024] HKCLC 469
- Re Pan Sutong [2022] HKCLC 837
- Re Cai Sui Rong[2019] HKCFI 514, HCB 2859/2018 (22 February 2019)
- Re Cai Sui Xin[2019] 6 HKC 329
General Civil and Commercial
- Shih Hua Investment v. Zhang Aidong [2025] 3 HKLRD 505
- Choi Hon Ying v. Tsoi Kwok Wai [2025] 4 HKC 81
- Vasily Trubnikov v. Evgeny Volosov [2025] HKCFI 1576
- Beijing Renji Real Estate Development Group Co., Ltd v Zhu Min [2024] 5 HKLRD 137; [2025] 1 HKC 754
- CCMD Overseas Ltd v. Sinom Investments Ltd [2024] 3 HKLRD 579
- 苏州太合汇投資管理有限公司 霍尔果斯市摩伽互联娱乐有限公司 [2023] 1 HKLRD 342; [2023] 1 HKC 609
- Poosaala Ram Prasad v. The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd[2023] 1 HKLRD 572
- Aleph Fabrizio Kraus, a minor by Eric Geroge Kraus, his next friend and father v. All Asset Management (Asia) Ltd and Another[2022] HKCFI 2992
- Dingway Investment Limited (Provisional Liquidators Appointed) v. China City Construction & Development Co., (Hong Kong) Ltd[2022] 4 HKLRD 67
- Beijing Renji Real Estate Development Group Co., Ltd v Zhu Min [2022] 4 HKC 116
- Perpetual Wealth (Hong Kong) Ltd v Be Solutions Co Ltd[2022] 2 HKLRD 546; [2022] 3 HKC 678
- Binchuang Resources Co., Ltd v Lockwood Group Ltd[2022] 2 HKLRD 221
- Chen Hongqing v Iu Yiu Keung Stephen And Others[2021] HKCFI 1804
Commercial Arbitration
- 中國機床銷售與技術服務有限公司v 國晟機電設備有限公司 [2024] 4 HKC 227
- Shenzhen Hina New Economy Equity Investment Fund Partnership v Unipax Properties, LLC[2021] HKCFI 2912
- UNCITRAL rules – acting in dispute relating to an oil field investment with claims over US$1 billion (led by William Wong SC, JP)
- UNCITRAL rules – acting in an insurance dispute with claim over US$10 million(sole advocate)
- HKIAC rules – acting in a dispute relating to the acquisition of a business in the PRC with claim over RMB$450 million (led by Anson Wong SC)
- HKIAC rules – acting in a debt recovery with claim over US$60 million (led by Rimsky Yuen SC)
- HKIAC rules – acting in a debt recovery claim with amount over HK$200 million (sole advocate)
- HKIAC rules – acting in a shareholder dispute representing shareholder claiming over HK$100 million damages (sole advocate)
- Tutor, Faculty of Law, University of Hong Kong
- Bar Scholarship (2016)
- Middle Temple Scholarship (2016)
- King’s Scholarship, University of Cambridge (2013-2014)
- George Plimpton Scholarship, University of Cambridge (2012-2014)
- George Long Prize for Jurisprudence, University of Cambridge (2013)
- Davies UWC Scholarship (2008-2012)
“Arbitration Agreements: ‘Contracting Out’ of Members’ Statutory Rights to Petition the Court for Unfair Prejudice And/ or Just and Equitable Winding Up.” Asian Dispute Review (2015): 84-90.
Arbitration, Banking & Finance, Commercial Law, Company Law, Insolvency, Trust & Probate and Succession, Urgent Injunction & Interlocutory Applications
Accolades
Lai Chun Ho has been recognised as a Leading Junior for Commercial disputes by Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2026 – Hong Kong Bar.
Legal 500 says “Chun Ho stands out for his exceptional legal knowledge and thorough understanding of all the intricate legal issues and ability to provide commercial and practical legal advice to lay clients. His drafting skills are first-rate and leave no stone unturned.”
- Legal 500 Asia Pacific: Hong Kong Bar (2026)
Lai Chun Ho has been recognised as a Rising Star for Commercial disputes by Legal 500 Asia Pacific 2025 – Hong Kong Bar.
- Legal 500 Asia Pacific: Hong Kong Bar (2025)
Lai Chun Ho is accredited in Legal 500 Asia Pacific (2024) as a Rising Star in Commercial Disputes.
“Lai is an outstanding barrister with a level of competence well beyond his years of call. He is always diligent with a firm grasp of the facts and in-depth knowledge of the law, and he is both commercially-minded and sensible, whilst being able to offer valuable and out of the box insights into cases.”